How to apply for marie curie fellowship – How to apply for a Marie Curie Fellowship? It sounds daunting, right? Like navigating a labyrinth built by eccentric scientists with a penchant for cryptic riddles. But fear not, aspiring researchers! This isn’t some arcane ritual requiring ancient scrolls and a sacrifice of a perfectly brewed cup of coffee. Securing a Marie Curie Fellowship is achievable, a thrilling journey of discovery waiting to unfold.
We’ll unravel the mysteries, guide you through the process step-by-step, and equip you with the tools and insights to craft a truly compelling application. Think of us as your Sherpas on this exciting climb to academic Everest.
This guide will cover everything from understanding eligibility criteria and identifying the right funding opportunity, to crafting a killer research proposal and building a supportive network. We’ll delve into the nitty-gritty details of the application process, providing practical tips and real-world examples to help you navigate each stage with confidence. We’ll even address those pesky common challenges, offering solutions to common pitfalls and strategies for handling potential setbacks.
By the end, you’ll be armed with the knowledge and confidence to embark on this rewarding journey. Let’s get started!
Eligibility Criteria for Marie Curie Fellowships: How To Apply For Marie Curie Fellowship
So, you’re dreaming of a Marie Curie Fellowship – that prestigious, life-changing opportunity to further your research career? Fantastic! But before you start packing your bags (metaphorically, for now!), let’s navigate the eligibility criteria. It’s a bit like assembling a particularly intricate Lego castle – each piece is crucial.
General Eligibility Requirements
The overarching aim is to support excellent researchers at various career stages, fostering innovation and collaboration across Europe. This means you’ll need a strong research proposal, demonstrating originality and potential impact. Think of it as pitching your brilliant idea to a panel of highly discerning experts – clarity, passion, and a compelling narrative are key. Beyond the research itself, you’ll need to demonstrate your commitment to the fellowship’s principles of mobility and knowledge sharing.
Navigating the Marie Curie Fellowship application? It’s a bit like charting a course to a new planet! First, you’ll need a stellar research proposal. Then, remember to check eligibility criteria carefully. Think of it as training for bigger challenges; applying for truly “extreme dreams,” like those detailed on the how to apply for extreme dreams page, requires similar dedication.
Once you’ve mastered the art of grant applications, the Marie Curie Fellowship will feel like a smooth, exciting journey. So go for it – your future self will thank you!
This isn’t just about getting funded; it’s about contributing to a wider scientific community.
Nationality and Research Experience
While the exact stipulations can vary slightly depending on the specific call, a common thread is the emphasis on international mobility. You generally need to be a researcher of any nationality, but your proposed research must take place in a host institution in a different country than your current one. Imagine the possibilities – a vibrant new city, a different research culture, and a chance to broaden your horizons.
Years of experience also factor into eligibility. Early-stage researchers (ESRs) will have different requirements than experienced researchers. This ensures the program supports researchers at every stage of their career journey. The program is designed to be truly inclusive and diverse, welcoming researchers from all backgrounds.
Required Qualifications and Previous Research Achievements
This is where your academic prowess really shines. You’ll need a strong academic record, demonstrated by a relevant doctoral degree (or equivalent) and publications in reputable journals. Think of this as your academic CV – a testament to your hard work, dedication, and impactful contributions to your field. Strong letters of recommendation from respected researchers are also essential, showcasing your potential and the high regard your peers hold for your work.
These aren’t just formalities; they’re vital pieces of the puzzle that help the selection panel assess your capabilities. Successful applicants often possess a proven track record of research achievements, perhaps demonstrated through previous grants, patents, or impactful publications.
Examples of Successful Applicants
Let’s paint a picture. Imagine Dr. Anya Sharma, a brilliant astrophysicist from India, who secured a fellowship to conduct groundbreaking research on dark matter at a leading university in the UK. Or consider Dr. Jean-Pierre Dubois, a seasoned chemist from France, leveraging his expertise to collaborate with a team in Germany on developing sustainable energy solutions.
Securing a Marie Curie Fellowship is a thrilling journey, demanding meticulous preparation. The application process itself is rigorous, but remember, even the most brilliant scientists need a little administrative help sometimes. For example, you’ll likely need to sort out your tax affairs, and that’s where knowing how to apply for a tax ID number online, via a helpful resource like how to apply for a tax id number online , becomes invaluable.
Getting your finances in order is one less hurdle on the path to achieving your research dreams and securing that coveted fellowship! So, focus on that compelling research proposal; the rest will follow.
These individuals, though from diverse backgrounds and research fields, share a common thread: a passion for their work, a clear research vision, and the ability to articulate their goals effectively. They are examples of researchers who successfully navigated the eligibility criteria, proving that with the right preparation and a compelling proposal, the dream of a Marie Curie Fellowship is within reach.
Securing a Marie Curie Fellowship? It’s a journey, a quest for scientific glory! The application process, though rigorous, is manageable. Think of it like this: navigating the application is similar to the process of, say, getting a dealership – you’ll need a solid plan and sharp focus. Check out this resource on how to apply for dealership for a glimpse into strategic planning.
Applying for the fellowship requires similar dedication and a compelling research proposal. So, polish your application, and remember, even the most ambitious scientific dreams are achievable with perseverance and a dash of daring!
Identifying Suitable Funding Opportunities
Embarking on a Marie Curie Fellowship journey is akin to charting a course to a treasure island – brimming with intellectual riches and opportunities for personal and professional growth. But before you hoist the sails, it’s crucial to navigate the waters of funding opportunities wisely. Choosing the right fellowship is paramount; it’s the key that unlocks the door to your research aspirations.
The Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) offer a diverse range of funding schemes, each with its own unique flavor and appeal. Understanding these nuances is essential to securing the perfect fit for your research project and career goals. Let’s delve into the exciting world of MSCA fellowships.
Types of Marie Curie Fellowships and Their Funding Schemes
The MSCA umbrella encompasses several fellowship types, each designed to support different career stages and research objectives. Think of it as a well-stocked toolbox, with each tool perfectly suited for a specific task. Let’s explore some of the most prominent options.
Fellowship Type | Funding Scheme Focus | Eligibility Criteria Highlights | Application Process Overview |
---|---|---|---|
Individual Fellowships (IF) | Experienced researchers; transnational mobility; research excellence. | Doctoral degree; research experience; mobility requirement; strong research proposal. | Online application; proposal submission; evaluation by experts; interview (potentially). |
Postdoctoral Fellowships (PF) | Early career researchers; research training and development; strengthening research capabilities. | Recent PhD; limited postdoctoral experience; focus on specific research areas. | Similar to IF; emphasis on training and career development plan. |
RISE (Research and Innovation Staff Exchange) | International collaboration; knowledge exchange; staff mobility. | Team-based applications; involvement of multiple organizations; focus on collaborative projects. | Consortium application; detailed project proposal; emphasis on international collaboration aspects. |
COFUND (Cofunded actions) | National and regional programs; complementing MSCA; increasing national capacity. | Specific criteria vary depending on the national/regional cofunded scheme; alignment with MSCA principles. | Application process defined by the specific cofunded scheme; often involving multiple stages. |
Specific Requirements and Deadlines for Each Fellowship Type
Each fellowship type comes with its own set of requirements and deadlines. Think of these as the checkpoints along your journey, each demanding careful attention to detail and meticulous planning. Missing a deadline can be a setback, so diligent preparation is key. The specific requirements are detailed on the official MSCA website and vary from year to year, so always check the latest information.
It’s like following a map – constantly updating your location and adjusting your route as needed.
For example, Individual Fellowships often emphasize a significant period of transnational mobility, requiring researchers to move to a different country for their research. Postdoctoral Fellowships might focus more on the development of specific research skills and career trajectory. COFUND schemes, being national or regional programs, will have their own specific timelines and requirements. The key is to carefully examine the call for proposals for the specific scheme you’re interested in.
Don’t just skim – immerse yourself in the details.
Remember, securing a Marie Curie Fellowship isn’t just about ticking boxes; it’s about showcasing your passion, potential, and commitment to advancing knowledge. Your dedication will shine through, making you a compelling candidate. This is your chance to make a real impact, to contribute to a global community of researchers pushing the boundaries of discovery. Embrace the challenge, believe in your abilities, and let your research aspirations soar.
Crafting a Compelling Research Proposal
Securing a Marie Curie Fellowship is a significant achievement, a testament to your dedication and potential. But the journey doesn’t end with a polished application; it culminates in a research proposal so captivating, so meticulously crafted, that it practically begs to be funded. This is your chance to showcase your brilliance, your innovative thinking, and your unwavering commitment to your research.
Let’s transform your brilliant idea into a winning proposal.A well-structured research proposal is more than just a collection of ideas; it’s a roadmap to discovery, a compelling narrative that convinces the reviewers of the project’s significance and your ability to execute it flawlessly. Think of it as a persuasive story, carefully plotted to captivate your audience from the very first sentence.
Research Proposal Structure
A robust research proposal follows a logical flow, guiding the reader through your research journey. Typically, this includes a concise and impactful introduction outlining the research problem, a detailed literature review demonstrating your understanding of the field, a clearly defined methodology explaining your approach, a realistic timeline for completion, a comprehensive budget, and finally, a strong conclusion that reiterates the significance of your work.
Each section builds upon the previous one, creating a cohesive and persuasive argument. Imagine it as building a house – you need a solid foundation (introduction), strong walls (literature review and methodology), a functional layout (timeline), and a beautiful exterior (conclusion) to create a stunning masterpiece.
The Importance of a Clear Research Question and Methodology
The heart of any successful research proposal lies in its central research question. This question should be sharp, focused, and original – a beacon guiding your entire research endeavor. A vague or overly broad question will lead to a muddled proposal and ultimately, rejection. Similarly, your methodology must be meticulously detailed, providing a clear roadmap of your research process.
This involves specifying your data collection methods, your analysis techniques, and your planned approach to address any potential challenges. Think of the research question as the destination and the methodology as the route map – without a clear destination and a detailed route, your journey will be aimless. For example, instead of a vague question like “How does climate change affect ecosystems?”, a stronger question might be “What is the impact of increased ocean acidification on the reproductive success of coral species X in the Great Barrier Reef?”.
This precise question allows for a focused methodology and measurable results.
Examples of Strong Research Proposals
While specific examples of successful proposals are confidential for privacy reasons, we can discuss general characteristics. Successful proposals demonstrate a deep understanding of the existing literature, identifying a clear gap in knowledge that the proposed research will address. They showcase originality and innovation, presenting a novel approach or perspective. They also provide a detailed and realistic plan for execution, demonstrating feasibility and addressing potential challenges.
Navigating the Marie Curie Fellowship application? It’s a journey, much like obtaining a Social Security card – a crucial step for many. For the latter, check out this helpful guide: how to apply for a social sercurity card. Once you’ve tackled that administrative hurdle (or if you’re already sorted!), remember to focus on your research proposal and showcase your brilliance.
Your Marie Curie dreams are within reach – go get ’em!
Crucially, they are exceptionally well-written, clear, concise, and compelling. Think of them as meticulously crafted narratives that engage the reader from beginning to end. A strong proposal is like a well-written novel, captivating and convincing.
Budget Justification
Creating a realistic and justifiable budget is critical. This involves itemizing all expenses, providing detailed justifications for each item, and demonstrating a clear understanding of the costs involved in your research. Don’t underestimate the importance of this section; a poorly justified budget can significantly weaken your application, even if your research is groundbreaking. For instance, justifying the cost of specialized equipment should include details about its necessity for the research, its unique capabilities, and why cheaper alternatives are inadequate.
A thorough budget shows you’ve thought through every detail, demonstrating your professionalism and preparedness. Think of it as presenting a carefully considered business plan, demonstrating your fiscal responsibility and commitment to efficient resource management. A well-justified budget showcases your attention to detail and your understanding of the financial implications of your project. It’s not just about numbers; it’s about demonstrating financial prudence and responsibility.
The Application Process
So, you’re ready to embark on this exciting journey – applying for a Marie Curie Fellowship! It might seem daunting at first, like navigating a labyrinth filled with forms and deadlines, but with a clear plan and a bit of organization, you’ll breeze through it. Think of it as a puzzle – once you understand the pieces, putting them together becomes much easier.
This step-by-step guide will illuminate the path.
The application process is designed to be thorough, ensuring that only the most promising researchers are selected. Remember, you’re not just filling out forms; you’re presenting your vision, your expertise, and your potential to a panel of esteemed experts. Let’s get started.
Key Documents Required
Preparing the necessary documents is the foundation of a successful application. Having everything organized and ready to go will significantly reduce stress and allow you to focus on the finer details. Missing even one crucial document can delay your application, so meticulous preparation is key. Consider creating a checklist to keep track of your progress.
Typically, you’ll need your CV, research proposal, budget breakdown, letters of support, and transcripts. Each document serves a specific purpose, highlighting different aspects of your qualifications and proposed research. Make sure each document is polished, professional, and accurately reflects your capabilities.
Navigating the Online Portal
The online portal is your gateway to submitting your application. It’s designed to guide you through each step of the process, providing clear instructions and helpful tips along the way. Take your time, carefully read all instructions, and double-check your information before submitting. Think of it as a meticulously crafted digital roadmap leading to your fellowship.
Familiarize yourself with the portal’s navigation before you begin uploading your documents. Many portals allow you to save your progress and return later, which is a lifesaver if you need to take breaks or make revisions. Don’t underestimate the value of planning your submissions strategically. A well-organized approach saves time and minimizes errors.
Adhering to Deadlines and Submission Guidelines
Deadlines are not suggestions; they are firm commitments. Missing a deadline can unfortunately result in your application being rejected outright. Therefore, plan your submission well in advance, allowing ample time for unforeseen delays or technical issues. Think of it as a high-stakes race where punctuality is paramount.
The submission guidelines are not just formalities; they are crucial elements for a successful application. Following them carefully demonstrates your attention to detail and your respect for the process. Ignoring these guidelines can lead to your application being deemed incomplete or even disqualified. Review the guidelines thoroughly and meticulously follow each instruction.
Navigating the Marie Curie Fellowship application? It’s a bit like a high-stakes game, demanding meticulous preparation. Think of it as the academic equivalent of securing a coveted spot on a championship team; you need to showcase your skills and potential. For instance, understanding the process might involve researching the criteria, much like learning how to effectively present your athletic prowess when applying for a sports scholarship, as detailed in this helpful guide: how to apply for a sports scholarship.
Ultimately, both require a compelling narrative, highlighting your achievements and future aspirations. So, polish your application, and dare to dream big – your Marie Curie Fellowship awaits!
Building a Strong Support Network
Securing a Marie Curie Fellowship isn’t just about a brilliant research proposal; it’s about building a robust team around you. Think of it as assembling your own scientific Avengers – each member bringing unique skills and unwavering support to your mission. A strong support network significantly boosts your chances of success, providing crucial guidance, advocacy, and collaboration throughout your fellowship journey.
Let’s explore how to build this vital network.Strong references and compelling recommendation letters are the cornerstones of a successful application. These aren’t just formalities; they’re powerful testimonials that speak volumes about your capabilities and potential. Think of them as your personal endorsements from leading figures in your field. They offer an independent validation of your skills and promise, adding weight to your application beyond your own self-assessment.
Identifying and Approaching Potential Supervisors and Mentors
Finding the right supervisor is akin to finding the perfect research partner – someone who shares your passion, understands your vision, and can guide you effectively. Start by identifying researchers whose work aligns with your research proposal. Thoroughly review their publications, projects, and affiliations. Don’t be shy; reach out to them via email, clearly outlining your research interests and explaining why you’re interested in working with them specifically.
Highlighting shared research goals and demonstrating a genuine understanding of their work will significantly increase your chances of a positive response. Remember to personalize your email – a generic template is a surefire way to get lost in the inbox. A well-crafted email showing genuine interest and enthusiasm can be the first step towards a productive collaboration.
Consider attending conferences and workshops related to your field to network and meet potential supervisors in person.
Building Relationships with Potential Collaborators
Collaboration is the lifeblood of modern science. Identifying and cultivating relationships with potential collaborators is essential for a successful fellowship. These individuals will not only enrich your research but also provide valuable support and insights. Begin by exploring existing collaborations within your chosen research area. Attend conferences, workshops, and seminars; these events are fertile grounds for networking and forging new connections.
Engage actively in discussions, ask insightful questions, and share your own work. Don’t be afraid to reach out to researchers whose work complements yours – a collaborative spirit is highly valued. Remember, building lasting relationships takes time and effort; nurture these connections through regular communication and mutual respect.
Strategies for Effective Networking within the Scientific Community
Networking is more than just exchanging business cards; it’s about building genuine connections based on shared interests and mutual respect. Embrace opportunities to present your research at conferences and workshops. This not only showcases your work but also allows you to engage with other researchers and build relationships. Actively participate in online forums and discussion groups relevant to your field.
Engage in meaningful conversations, share your insights, and offer help to others. Consider joining professional organizations and attending their events. These organizations offer excellent networking opportunities and access to resources that can significantly benefit your career. Remember, networking is a two-way street; be generous with your time and knowledge, and you’ll find that others will reciprocate.
Building a strong network takes time and effort, but the rewards are immeasurable. Think of it as investing in your future – a future filled with exciting collaborations and groundbreaking discoveries. Your network will not only support your Marie Curie Fellowship application but will also serve as a valuable asset throughout your career.
Addressing Common Application Challenges
So, you’ve poured your heart and soul into crafting a stellar Marie Curie Fellowship application. You’ve meticulously researched, written, and rewritten. You’re practically radiating brilliance. But even the most brilliant applications can stumble. Let’s address those common pitfalls and transform potential weaknesses into strengths.
Think of this as your personal application-rescue mission.Let’s tackle some common mistakes that trip up even the most seasoned applicants. Many miss the mark by not fully understanding the nuances of the specific fellowship call. It’s not just about fitting your research; it’s about demonstrating a perfect fit forthis particular* opportunity. Another frequent issue is a lack of clarity and conciseness in the research proposal.
Remember, clarity is king – or queen, in this case! Overly ambitious proposals, lacking a clear methodology or realistic timeline, are also red flags. Finally, many overlook the importance of strong letters of support – those recommendations need to sing your praises convincingly.
Common Application Errors and Their Solutions, How to apply for marie curie fellowship
Failing to tailor your application to the specific call is a major pitfall. Imagine sending a generic cover letter – it screams “I didn’t really read your requirements!” Instead, meticulously analyze the call’s s, priorities, and objectives. Show, don’t just tell, how your research aligns perfectly. For example, if the call emphasizes interdisciplinary collaboration, highlight your past experiences working across different fields.
If it prioritizes societal impact, clearly articulate the potential benefits of your research for society. A perfectly tailored application showcases genuine interest and understanding, significantly increasing your chances.
Addressing Weaknesses in Your Application
A less-than-stellar publication record? Don’t panic. Focus on thequality* over quantity of your work. Highlight the impact of your publications, focusing on citations, awards, or media coverage. A strong methodology section in your research proposal can also compensate for a smaller publication list.
Showcase your skills and experience through detailed descriptions of projects, emphasizing your contributions and outcomes. Remember, your application is a holistic picture of your potential. If you lack experience in a particular area, emphasize transferable skills and your capacity for rapid learning. For example, if a call requires experience with a specific software, explain how your skills in similar software make you adaptable and quick to learn the required tool.
Responding to Frequently Asked Questions
The FAQ section often holds clues to the selection committee’s priorities. Use it to your advantage! Anticipate questions and craft compelling answers that directly address the concerns expressed in the FAQs. This demonstrates your thorough preparation and understanding of the fellowship. For instance, if the FAQ highlights the importance of international collaboration, showcase your experience working with international teams or your plans to build such collaborations.
If the FAQ asks about the feasibility of your project timeline, provide a detailed and realistic work plan that addresses potential challenges.
Handling Rejections and Improving Future Applications
Rejection is a part of the process, a tough but valuable learning experience. Don’t let it discourage you! Request feedback from the reviewers if possible; this constructive criticism is gold. Analyze your application objectively, identifying areas for improvement. Perhaps your research proposal lacked clarity, or your letters of support weren’t strong enough. This feedback provides a roadmap for your next application.
Use this opportunity to strengthen your application for future funding calls, focusing on the specific areas that need enhancement. Persistence and learning from setbacks are crucial for success in this competitive field. View each rejection not as a failure, but as a stepping stone towards your ultimate goal. Remember, even the most successful scientists faced numerous rejections before achieving their breakthroughs.
Post-Application Procedures
So, you’ve hit the “submit” button – congratulations! The adrenaline might be fading, but the journey is far from over. This section navigates the often-uncharted waters of what happens after you send off your Marie Curie Fellowship application. Think of it as your post-submission survival guide.The evaluation process is rigorous, a bit like a high-stakes game of academic chess.
Your application will be assessed by a panel of experts in your field, who will meticulously scrutinize every detail, from the brilliance of your research proposal to the feasibility of your project timeline. They’re looking for originality, impact, and the potential for you to become a leading researcher in your area. It’s a comprehensive review, so patience is key.
The Evaluation Process
After submission, your application enters a multi-stage evaluation process. First, administrative checks ensure completeness and eligibility. Then, expert reviewers assess the scientific merit, innovation, and potential impact of your proposal. Finally, a panel of experts makes funding recommendations based on the scores from the reviewers. The entire process can take several months, so maintaining a positive attitude and focusing on other projects is important.
Imagine it as a marathon, not a sprint.
Communication with the Marie Curie Fellowship Program
Maintaining open communication with the Marie Curie program is crucial. You’ll receive regular email updates on the status of your application through the online portal. It’s vital to check this portal regularly and respond promptly to any requests for additional information. Think of it as a two-way street; engaging actively shows your commitment and keeps the process moving smoothly.
Delays in responding can unfortunately impact your chances. A timely response to a query is just as important as a brilliant research proposal.
Accepting an Offer and Starting the Fellowship
Receiving a positive notification is a fantastic achievement! It means you’ve successfully navigated the challenging application process. Accepting the offer involves signing a formal agreement outlining the terms and conditions of the fellowship. This will include details on funding, timelines, and reporting requirements. After acceptance, you’ll work closely with the Marie Curie team and your host institution to finalize arrangements for your research.
This might involve visa applications, travel arrangements, and setting up your research space. Think of this as the exciting part – the beginning of your amazing research journey. The Marie Curie team will provide comprehensive support throughout this process. For example, one successful applicant, Dr. Anya Sharma, received regular check-ins from her designated program officer, ensuring a smooth transition to her new research environment.
This kind of support is a hallmark of the Marie Curie Fellowship program.
Illustrative Examples of Successful Applications
Securing a Marie Curie Fellowship is a significant achievement, requiring meticulous planning and a compelling application. Let’s examine two fictional yet realistic examples to illustrate successful strategies. These examples, while not based on actual individuals, highlight key elements frequently found in winning applications.
Example 1: Dr. Anya Sharma – Sustainable Materials Science
Dr. Anya Sharma, a materials scientist with five years of postdoctoral experience at MIT, aimed to develop bio-based polymers for packaging applications. Her research, building upon her previous work on biodegradable plastics, proposed a novel approach using genetically modified algae to produce a high-performance, environmentally friendly alternative to petroleum-based plastics. Her strong background, evidenced by publications in high-impact journals and presentations at international conferences, formed the bedrock of her application.Dr.
Sharma’s research proposal detailed a three-year project, outlining specific objectives, methodologies, timelines, and expected outcomes. She meticulously planned her experiments, demonstrating a deep understanding of her field and a realistic approach to achieving her goals. The budget, totaling €250,000, was comprehensively justified, allocating funds for materials, equipment, travel to conferences, and personnel costs (including a PhD student). Supporting documents included letters of support from her MIT mentor, highlighting her research capabilities and potential, and a detailed work plan outlining collaborations with European partners.
The overall application was clear, concise, and demonstrated a strong understanding of the broader context of her research within the field of sustainable materials.
Example 2: Dr. Ben Carter – Computational Neuroscience
Dr. Ben Carter, a neuroscientist with experience in machine learning, took a different approach. Instead of focusing solely on experimental work, his application centered on developing novel computational models to understand the neural basis of decision-making. His application cleverly showcased his computational skills and expertise through interactive visualizations and simulations embedded within the proposal itself. This visual presentation of his complex models allowed the reviewers to grasp the innovative aspects of his work more readily.Dr.
Carter’s proposal, focusing on a two-year project, used a less traditional narrative style. He opted for a more modular approach, presenting each component of his research (model development, validation, and application) as a self-contained section with clear visual aids. His budget, totaling €180,000, was leaner than Dr. Sharma’s, reflecting his reliance on computational resources rather than extensive laboratory equipment.
He highlighted his collaborative network, emphasizing the potential for future collaborations with European researchers in the field. His supporting documents, rather than focusing solely on traditional letters of support, included pre-prints of his recent work, showcasing the impact and quality of his research. This approach effectively demonstrated the originality and feasibility of his computational approach to a complex scientific problem.